May 2012
102 posts
April 2012
203 posts
Ron Paul is a fad candidate. Obama was a fad candidate. That was my analogy. I suppose it’s easy for you shrug off the abortion thing since you have a penis.
EDIT:
here’s just the first link on google: http://news.yahoo.com/ron-paul-birth-control-issues-000000458.html. He is against abortion, and he wants to hinder planned parenthood. so he doesn’t give a shit about women’s bodies. sooo…he IS against women’s rights. it’s as plain as that. i forgot he was an OB/GYN, which is cruelly ironic.
All you stupid twats that are bandwagonning on about Ron Paul need to do some research. Just because Ron Paul is the next “it” candidate, the next t-shirt president like Obama, doesn’t mean you should give into supporting him. He’s about more than just legalizing weed. He’s also against WOMEN’S RIGHTS! He is against ABORTION, and BIRTH CONTROL. He is just a republican who got unnecessary attention about his stance on cannabis. Stop putting up his campaign signs, stop wearing the fucking t-shirts, stop talking about him like a messiah, and stop to think about the fact that everybody did this with Obama….just because he was faddish and black and had a slogan (and no actual specified plans behind vague, sweeping, general niceties). Candidates should not be treated like celebrities or fads. THEY ARE NOT T-SHIRTS. THEY ARE OUR NEXT GRAND RAPISTS. THEY WILL FUCK YOU AND FUCK YOU AND FUCK YOU, AND YOU WON’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT EXCEPT DON BUMPERSTICKERS AND OVERPRICED “OBEY” T-SHIRTS.